Come on our Scottish friends. Who is it? Spill the beans.

[chris35]

Obviously the celebrity being naughty with 2 other people is far too private to share with us lot. Come on H and Scunner,let us in on the secret.

[Highlander]

I don't know about scunner, but I am not following chris35

[JohnF]

Use google if you really want to know.

I know its unlikely - but as this site is hosted in England, if someone spilled the beans on here then Keith (as the sites"publisher" ) would have broken a high court injunction and could (if caught) face the resultant consequences. 

Farcical situation.

JF

[chris35]

Use google if you really want to know.

I know its unlikely - but as this site is hosted in England, if someone spilled the beans on here then Keith (as the sites"publisher" ) would have broken a high court injunction and could (if caught) face the resultant consequences. 

Farcical situation.

JF

Wow,that's a relief. I'll get straight on the phone to my 2 friends and say we are still in the clear.

[KKOB]

I don't know about scunner, but I am not following chris35

And I always believed that you had your finger on the pulse H.

Stop watching the overpaid bladder-kickers and get back on track man !  

[Colwyn]

as this site is hosted in England, if someone spilled the beans on here then Keith ... would have broken a high court injunction and could (if caught) face the resultant consequences.

So would it be OK if it was hosted in Scotland?

[JohnF]

as this site is hosted in England, if someone spilled the beans on here then Keith ... would have broken a high court injunction and could (if caught) face the resultant consequences.

So would it be OK if it was hosted in Scotland?

Yep.  In fact, as long as it is hosted outwith the jurisdiction of the injunction then no action can be taken for breaking the injunction.  The physical data centre where the site files and database is accepted as being the "point of publication" by many opinions - where the site (domain name) is registered is irrelevant.  But like everything in law, both points are open to debate.

Another idiosyncrasy of UK law is that in the UK, a web site owner is responsible for the content/comments whereas in many other countries, including the US, its the inverse - the commenter/poster is solely responsible for their comment or posting.  Its why many mainstream digital publications moderate comments made under articles.

JF

[BernieTeyze]

I don't think we can say on here, we,d be snuffed out like a candle in the wind.

[JohnF]

Which would Let the Sun go Down on Me, But I'm Still Standing...  maybe on the Yellow Brick Road.  All these Sad Songs, Maybe That's Why They Call it the Blues.

Total non fecking story in my opinion. 

JF

[Steve A]

What an absolute load of removed_by_swear_filter this issue around injunctions .Who is really interested who shags who,with who,how and with what?If an injunction is meant to stop dialogue it has exactly the opposite effect