As a now retired English Heritage Inspector of Works I have to agree that the current renovation is somewhat "plastic". By this I mean that the Belidye have resorted to the use of modern marble ( not granite) to replace the original stone that was taken away and is now I am sure lodged in various buildings around Paspatur.
Nevertheless, without the original stonework, what does one do? Of course taking stones from other monuments could make the place look realistic. But that would lead to the detriment of the original source of the stone ( Cadiander springs to mind). Replacing like stone for like stone would I am sure be really expensive.
So, what to do?
This has been the question that has plagued EH over ther years. For instance, I had a monument in the South West that consisted of stone and plaster. The stone survived well but the plaster, some dating back over 400 years was becoming weather worn. What to do??
we decided that the plaster, though historic would cost so much to treat over the coming years, that it would be best left to go. There were other monuments with examples of such plaster.
So, what about Fethiye (Telmessos) ancient theatre? Not unique in design, not one of a kind. nothing to distinguish it from myriad others around Turkey.
If it were my decision it would be. Let it go, by all means maintain the site, look after the information panels to let people know what it was.
Do not do as they are doing now as in remodelling it to appear as though it is, what it was. But it is not, it is nothing but a modern interpretation of a classical design.
Unless, and this is most important. the general public are told that this monument has been remodelled on the perceived interpretation of the ancient site plan and that very little of it is original.
I am sure that when finished, Fethiye Belidiye will use the theatre to stage cultural events, hopefully not political as I can see what mileage could be made by Mr RTE opening the place!!!!!