What you cannot see Scunner is that you are arguing about nothing to do with my original question.On one hand you say Rodgers was not your choice as a Liverpool manager.Then you say something which is the opposite and defend him as the greatest manager of all time. Come on how is it i am ridiculous and your not? I deal with percentages a lot in my job so don't come out with all that rubbish.Why is it whatever topic it is on this forum you think you know it all above everyone else . Dont answer that I can guess.
I know more about every subject than every single one of the 11,000 members and it's my forum so I am right.
Especially when it comes to answering you. Dealing with percentages a lot in your job? I haven't quoted or mentioned a single percentage so your "experience" isn't going to help you in this topic, 50% wit.
Unlike you I can think rationally, hence while I don't think much of Rodgers as a manager, I can quote facts that prove he has wasted less money (or let's say a lower percentage so you can follow it) than Van Gaal - this is mainly down to Rodgers spending "over £200 million" as you claim in his
three years at Liverpool, compared withe Van Gaal spending £150 million in
TEN MONTHS at United.
Who is spending most? I'll give you a clue in round figures for you - 200/36, 150/10.
And you claim I'm the one talking rubbish!!!