Calis Beach and Fethiye Turkey Discussion Forum

General Topics => Football => Topic started by: Jacqui Harvey on April 21, 2014, 20:30:13 PM

Title: Man City V WBA... What a lot of money.
Post by: Jacqui Harvey on April 21, 2014, 20:30:13 PM
We have got the match on at the moment and just heard that there are only a few WBA fans at the match. They are staying away as a protest as M.City are charging £50.00 a ticket.   Scary to think just how much it is costing fans these days to watch a match. >:( :o :(
Title: Re: Man City V WBA... What a lot of money.
Post by: engineerdave on April 22, 2014, 19:30:29 PM
Admission fees
FIRST TEAM MATCHES
Ground
Adults £10.00

Thats what I pay to watch my local team. No they aren't in the premier   :)
Title: Re: Man City V WBA... What a lot of money.
Post by: stoop on April 22, 2014, 19:37:05 PM
Sign if the times. Liverpool are charging Chelsea supporters £48. Sold out their allocation as well!
Title: Re: Man City V WBA... What a lot of money.
Post by: engineerdave on April 22, 2014, 19:51:45 PM
Agree Stoop. If the fans want the best stadiums and the best players and best managers in the world it costs money. If you cannot afford it then you become like millions of others...armchair fans.
What would we do without live football on the box. Eventually only the well off will be able to afford to go to watch a live game. Sad but true.
Title: Re: Man City V WBA... What a lot of money.
Post by: stoop on April 22, 2014, 20:25:41 PM
We were in Leeds shopping yesterday and I talked the wife into going to the Leeds game. Then I realised she would want a decent seat, a drink, maybe something to eat and I decided at £70 for two tickets, £10 for drinks, £10 for a couple of burgers and £6 for parking it was cheaper to keep her shopping!
Title: Re: Man City V WBA... What a lot of money.
Post by: Scunner on April 22, 2014, 21:03:48 PM
And how long does a Man City star have to work to earn that £50?
Title: Re: Man City V WBA... What a lot of money.
Post by: engineerdave on April 22, 2014, 21:31:10 PM
It doesn't bother me what players earn as long as they show on the pitch that they are 100% committed
 to the club and show it on the pitch. What really weees me off is when I read about how they act away from the club they play for. When I read how they are involved in night club fights..getting weeed out of their heads and drive their 100 grand cars..get caught and get away with a slap on the wrist...because they have a grand an hour mouth piece representing them.In other words the money has gone to their heads. 
Title: Re: Man City V WBA... What a lot of money.
Post by: pops on April 22, 2014, 21:42:28 PM
But, Man City do have the cheapest season tickets in the Premier league.....

http://talksport.com/football/shocking-figures-your-clubs-season-ticket-price-1981-compared-now-14040285756

(I'm not a city fan by the way)
Title: Re: Man City V WBA... What a lot of money.
Post by: engineerdave on April 22, 2014, 22:06:08 PM
We were in Leeds shopping yesterday and I talked the wife into going to the Leeds game. Then I realised she would want a decent seat, a drink, maybe something to eat and I decided at £70 for two tickets, £10 for drinks, £10 for a couple of burgers and £6 for parking it was cheaper to keep her shopping!

Did you win the game   :)  :)  :)
Title: Re: Man City V WBA... What a lot of money.
Post by: stoop on April 23, 2014, 09:19:00 AM
No Dave we lost - but I won in the money stakes  :)
Title: Re: Man City V WBA... What a lot of money.
Post by: tiggsy on April 23, 2014, 13:01:55 PM
I was at the match. No complaints.
Title: Re: Man City V WBA... What a lot of money.
Post by: tiggsy on April 23, 2014, 18:48:10 PM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FM8FI2NRuhY

This one got in free, apparently a ghost. Your thoughts is it a fake?     sorry the link didn't work but if you google "ghost in football stadium" you should get a result.
Title: Re: Man City V WBA... What a lot of money.
Post by: Scunner on April 23, 2014, 22:09:35 PM
For youtube links if they come up as invalid just removed the 's' from https - so it starts http:// not https://   - it will work then.