I think that's how many of us feel Karen - it's like Liz has hung up her boots after years of physically draining work and those replacing her need to discredit her. I know Liz and it will never succeed. THe 'malicious' bit annoyed me, but what really p1553d me off was this later comment
All I am saying is it looks like someone tried to Jeopardise the event because apart from the post (which in some peoples opinion was a misunderstanding, fair comment)
The 'malicious' remark is removed, and someone (Liz) is accused of trying to jeopardise the event. Quick jump to suggesting that
'a misunderstanding' is fair comment Something like 'a misunderstanding that could have jeopardised the event' would be fine but it doesn't say that. The accusation of trying to jeopardise the event remains - i.e. the implication that this was done deliberately, to harm the charity.
My feeling is that if the legacy of Liz's time irritates, try and build a bigger one. Don't try and discredit what went before. Having lived in Calis, I know a bit about this sort of mentality.