I think UBT has highlighted a key issue very precisely. There are two cases running almost concurrently. Both involve sets of people accused of murder, in both cases the killing was recorded and published in vision and sound, in both cases an unarmed enemy combatant was deliberately - with forethought - killed, and both cases came before a court. In a country that believes in the equality of all before the law I would expect and demand nothing less. If some people want to say one set should have legal treatment because they are some of "us" whilst another lot ought to be deprived of this and found guilty and sentenced without trial because they are "them" then I condemn that absolutely and will do everything I can, legally and without violence, to oppose such notions infecting my country.