Calis Beach and Fethiye Turkey Discussion Forum

General Topics => Football => Topic started by: desmartinson on November 10, 2013, 07:50:56 AM

Title: Chelsea v West Brom
Post by: desmartinson on November 10, 2013, 07:50:56 AM
Methinks it is time to add video technology to the  penalty box area, the goal line system works well, something has to be done to stop this incessant diving in the box, west brom robbed of 3 points yesterday, would also like to know why  they got 6 minutes extra time, did Mourhino have S A F watch on.  ;)  :)
Title: Re: Chelsea v West Brom
Post by: usedbustickets on November 10, 2013, 09:08:54 AM
No need for live technology, everyone can see that he cheated.  10 match ban for any player found cheating in this way when their team has benefited in the match result, with the use of retrospective video evidence - don't believe you should stop game for video.

Is it me but is Maureen starting to lose it, as predicted by my good self before the start of the season.  He looks under great personal pressure, a la Wenger at times in the last 5 years or so.  Still we'll see how he and Chelski get on after this international break.

And finally, my prediction for the Gooners versus Man MU this afternoon, 1-8 our defense is better than theirs was when they beat us...tee hee   ;) ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D
Title: Re: Chelsea v West Brom
Post by: Highlander on November 10, 2013, 09:33:35 AM
Mourinho's comments after the game were disgraceful.

And yes, usedbustickets, I think you are correct about him - he is losing it.

From being a somewhat likeable rogue he comes across as an arrogant sod. Perhaps he always was.

PS How about a ban for the referree who had a clear view of the incident.
Title: Re: Chelsea v West Brom
Post by: Jacqui Harvey on November 10, 2013, 09:51:21 AM
This was a travesty, should never have been a penalty.  I always liked Mourinho, but after that interview I am amazed just how dishonest he was, he said he watched the incident a number of times and it was a penalty, what a lot of tosh.  I feel sorry for Steve Clarke,  The Special One's former No.2.  His team had the win snatched from them at the last minute.
Title: Re: Chelsea v West Brom
Post by: Ian on November 10, 2013, 11:08:07 AM
This was a travesty, should never have been a penalty.  I always liked Mourinho, but after that interview I am amazed just how dishonest he was, he said he watched the incident a number of times and it was a penalty, what a lot of tosh.  I feel sorry for Steve Clarke,  The Special One's former No.2.  His team had the win snatched from them at the last minute.

Totally agree - I have always liked him and had him down to win the Premier League this season - but something seems not quite right .............
Title: Re: Chelsea v West Brom
Post by: desmartinson on November 10, 2013, 12:37:24 PM
- don't believe you should stop game for video.




But the game was stopped Pete, soon as he blew for a foul, then with video tech everyone could see on the big screen and the official could make his decision, straight  red card in everyones opinion except Mr Arrogant. >:(
Title: Re: Chelsea v West Brom
Post by: usedbustickets on November 10, 2013, 14:09:16 PM
des as that what they call an 'impartial' response?


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk (http://tapatalk.com/m?id=1)
Title: Re: Chelsea v West Brom
Post by: desmartinson on November 11, 2013, 06:12:24 AM
  ;)  ;)
Title: Re: Chelsea v West Brom
Post by: stoop on November 12, 2013, 15:21:55 PM
If you make contact with an oponent in the box they will go down. Never mind what Shearer and Owen say - they would have gone down in exactly the same way and 'played' for the spot kick.

It's wrong but it's life in football these days.
Title: Re: Chelsea v West Brom
Post by: teetee on November 12, 2013, 15:38:44 PM
Totally agree Stoop
Title: Re: Chelsea v West Brom
Post by: stoop on November 12, 2013, 15:54:58 PM
.. and to add to that - any West Brom player would have done the same in that situation as well I think.
Title: Re: Chelsea v West Brom
Post by: Jacqui Harvey on November 12, 2013, 17:12:07 PM
Yes Stoop, but if you actually run into the player and he has his arm by his side and you fall down ...Is this a penalty??
Title: Re: Chelsea v West Brom
Post by: desmartinson on November 12, 2013, 17:17:42 PM
- they would have gone down in exactly the same way and 'played' for the spot kick.

It's wrong but it's life in football these days.
Then I take it you agree with me Stoop, hence video technology  and  then ban them for a good few games, I mean if you can get a ban for nibbling someones ear, arm, etc, lets apply it to all.  ;)  ;)
Title: Re: Chelsea v West Brom
Post by: stoop on November 12, 2013, 19:29:24 PM
I've seen worse penalty decisions to be honest. Unless we replace the refs with robots there will always be errors. Not sure I want to go down the Rugby League route.

Swings and roundabouts most managers would say.
Title: Re: Chelsea v West Brom
Post by: desmartinson on November 13, 2013, 07:12:39 AM
Not sure I want to go down the Rugby League route.


It works though Stoop doesn't it?  :)
Title: Re: Chelsea v West Brom
Post by: teetee on November 13, 2013, 09:35:36 AM
This debate will rage on and on. Lets accept that the current situation remains and that the so called injustices continue, which they have been for donkeys years now.

For decisions that are wrong and go against a team the opposite also happens. What I always find amusing is that generally the team who get the "wrong" decision's supports never have an issue with the said decision.

In the instance that is being discussed being a Chelsea supported do I have a problem with it no, when it is the other way around do I have a problem yes of course which I think is call bias  ;)  ;)
Title: Re: Chelsea v West Brom
Post by: stoop on November 13, 2013, 11:29:47 AM
I remember the linesman flagging for offside against West Brom and the ref allowing play to continue. Cost us the title in 1971.

I'm not bitter!

http://youtu.be/fxVtScYFT6c
Title: Re: Chelsea v West Brom
Post by: teetee on November 13, 2013, 13:55:46 PM
Exactly Stoop 42 years and nothing has changed.................can't wait to see what decisions are made in 2055 oops that's if I last till I'm 93!!
Title: Re: Chelsea v West Brom
Post by: stoop on November 13, 2013, 15:17:27 PM
I suppose, unless you are a supporter of the offended team, it stops the game from becoming too 'robotic', 'clinical' or whatever else we could call it if decisions were always correct.

Just imagine - no mistakes from the officials - no need for the pundits after the match. Boring?

 :)
Title: Re: Chelsea v West Brom
Post by: teetee on November 13, 2013, 15:46:10 PM
There certainly would be less aggrieved supports on CBF than currently   ;)
Title: Re: Chelsea v West Brom
Post by: Jacqui Harvey on November 13, 2013, 17:04:41 PM
I don't support either team. I watched the match and saw this as an injustice.  I have a neutral and unbiased opinion. 
Title: Re: Chelsea v West Brom
Post by: desmartinson on November 13, 2013, 17:16:05 PM
What a great topic I started, just love to sit back and watch.  ;)  :)  :)
Title: Re: Chelsea v West Brom
Post by: Jacqui Harvey on November 13, 2013, 17:23:59 PM
Des, you are a right little tinker   ;D :o
Title: Re: Chelsea v West Brom
Post by: stoop on November 13, 2013, 23:45:05 PM
Are women allowed to discuss football ?

 :)
Title: Re: Chelsea v West Brom
Post by: desmartinson on November 14, 2013, 06:33:40 AM
Absolutely Stoop, especially when they seem to know more about it than some men  ;) and our Jacqui certainly does, as she is a M S supporter.  ;)   That's stands for Marks & Spencers  by the way.  :)  :)  :)
Title: Re: Chelsea v West Brom
Post by: teetee on November 14, 2013, 08:51:17 AM
I don't support either team. I watched the match and saw this as an injustice.   

Unfortunately Jacqui the world is full of injustices footballing decisions are just one of them.......... ;)

Title: Re: Chelsea v West Brom
Post by: Jacqui Harvey on November 14, 2013, 11:13:20 AM
Yes, there has always be injustice in Football, from the days when I was 16 years old and STANDING in the Kop to the present day, but there would be no interesting discussions or watchable footie programmes without injustice in games
Des, my head my be in shopping, but my heart is in L.F.C.