I never said that any post had not been allowed.
I never said that you said that any post had not been allowed. I was making a point of order, that any one sidedness was purely down to the nature of the posts contributed.
It is interesting however that you defend your chosen establishment and accuse others of not having seen what went on. Furthermore, it is quite disturbing that in your original post you imply that people who (allegedly) show aggression in this establishment shouldn't be surprised at what might happen - even though it may well be the case that what could have happened was getting beaten with a bat, stripped of their clothes and their possessions. Maybe you didn't mean that, but that is certainly the implication.
You feel it is extremely unlikely that the story is true or even credible - even though this is apparently certainly not a one off incident at this place.
I also find it incredible that in situations like this, people accuse others of talking when they didn't see what happened - judgemtal opinions, nearly always written by people who didn't see what happened but don't think that matters in their case.