So it isn't an act of terrorism because this welsh guy acted alone. But when a Muslim acts alone it is an act of terrorism?
I agree. There is no evidence that Khalid Masood, the Westminster Bridge killer, was attached to or assisted by any Muslim terror group although, as is their policy, ISIS claimed him as an "Islamic soldier" afterwards. This did not prevent him being, in view rightly, being labelled a "terrorist". What is common on phone-in programmes following a terrorist attack is that a number of people say that the "Muslim community" should have done more to stop this - even though it often turns out that the perpetrator was known to the police because he had been reported by his Muslim neighbours. It would not be surprising if members of the Muslim community felt unfairly burdened by the actions of isolated individuals.
Yesterday I heard no-one asking why the Cardiff community hadn't done more to stop this - his friends, his neighbours, his family. Instead what we have is the claim that he is not a terrorist; just a nutcase. Is there any evidence that he is insane? At least any more insane than anyone else who deliberately drives a vehicle into a crowd of people? I guess if I was a discontented trouble-maker in the Muslim community I would telling everyone "See! Double standards in this country!
Their deaths are terrorism -
Our deaths are the result an unfortunate mental problem!"