Author Topic: Wild Horses - which one? (Read 2235 times)

Jacqui Harvey · « **on:** December 03, 2009, 18:53:39 PM »

I cannot decide between Susan Boyle and The Rolling Stones, both versions of Wild Horses are so different, and so good. What does everyone else think?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bz6BA1heMSI
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HFegq4q7p2s

Gorgeous_bird · « **Reply #1 on:** December 03, 2009, 20:18:23 PM »

errrr no contest - the Stones

badger · « **Reply #2 on:** December 03, 2009, 20:25:44 PM »

As covers go Subo sings it well but The Stones are No 1 for me

loz · « **Reply #3 on:** December 03, 2009, 22:25:54 PM »

Definitely Susan Boyle her version has more feeling and melody, Stones have always sounded too nasally (is that a word?) to me.

Scunner · « **Reply #4 on:** December 03, 2009, 22:28:46 PM »

Donny Osmond every time for me

Jacqui Harvey · « **Reply #5 on:** December 03, 2009, 22:36:15 PM »

They might be Wild but they are not Crazy!!!
On reflection, I have decided I like Susan Boyle's version better.

nuttybird · « **Reply #6 on:** December 04, 2009, 12:47:26 PM »

Rolling Stones all the way! Subo has done a good version but sometimes shes sounds like shes dragging it on a bit! But then im biased as i love the Stone! ;-)

Mr Pickles · « **Reply #7 on:** December 05, 2009, 07:41:54 AM »

No contest ......... Rolling stones for me every time - SB's version is more like 'Wild ~~fillies~~ mares' :

jonuzumlu · « **Reply #8 on:** December 05, 2009, 10:31:18 AM »

I'll go for Stones acoustic version

peter16 · « **Reply #9 on:** December 06, 2009, 00:20:24 AM »

how can it not be the stones. It's a blues/ rockblues number not a scottish lament(although her version is pretty good, it just proves how good the actual song is)

Author Topic: Wild Horses - which one? (Read 2235 times)

Share me