Hi,
Whilst the story I related is certainly true, the information may of course not be, we all know what it is like here in Turkey, with the right hand not knowing what the left is doing, and 1001 interpretations of the same rules and regulations!LOL
Not being funny, and you would expect someone working in the insurance business at Aveva to know what's what, but I am more inclined to listen to what the Lawyer has said, he is not just a solicitor, and is well respected.
Odd, but as I say, not unusual, for two different insurance companies to have two different opinions, but it is hardly likely that one of them has decided to invent this supposed change to the system, so it is highly likely that something is afoot.....
It is not inconceivable that some insurance companies will enforce any changes, whilst other will ignore them.
Time will tell.....
As Keith says, it may well not be worth having Dask insurance anyway, although it is also my understanding that it is a legal requirement, but that doesn't mean much here. It fact you could extend that argument to buildings insurance as well. For example, if your apartment block fell down, and you live on the top floor, or any floor for that matter, if there are people in the block who have not got Dask plus additional buildings insurance, and therefore cannot afford to rebuild, unless your apartment can be attached to sky hooks, you have got a major problem.
Sorry, but just another reason on a huge list of reasons not to buy property in Turkey, in my opinion, especially on a complex.
Cheers
Gordon