Locked Topic... the facts.

[Strawberry]

Hi Minxer,

I rarely read the forum, and so am not familiar with the background to your story. What happened to you was horrific, and I feel sorry for you.

However, I feel it is your responsibility to get this psychotic man off the streets. Because that's what he is - a psycho.  Any man capable of smashing a metal bar across the top of a woman's face, almost breaking her eye-socket and breaking her nose needs to be taken off the streets.  He is dangerous.

He didn't care that he could have SOO easily killed you by smashing that metal bar to your head, and you say that he now struts around the resort like a cockeral with no remorse at all. Your reasoning not to report him is that you are scared of the repurcussions is ridiculous; you are actually in MORE danger by NOT reporting him. He could quite likely do it again to you. And next time he may kill you.

It's also your duty to get this psychotic potential murderer off the streets, cos going by statistics any man who is capable of this level of grevious bodily harm (especially against a defenseless woman - and one he supposedly CARES FOR!) is more than likely to do it again - whether it be to you or another person.

I understand you are frightened of him, and yet you're not so frightened as to escape from the area. I wouldn't hang around!  Do you own a property or business there? What is it that keeps you there?

 

[lmaddy]

The only duty you have Minxer is to yourself..............you do what you feel is best.

[Strawberry]

I don't agree that the only duty Minxer has is to herself.  The man is clearly dangerous and liable to attack someone else again. He obviously can't control his aggression, and needs to be chemically coshed.

If a wild animal was stalking Calis I'm sure people would want to know about it. And this man is just that. Besides that, he needs to PAY for what he's done!  How DARE he commit GBH and get away with it!!!

It's Minxer's duty to report him, but she is in effect PROTECTING him! Maybe, despite the fact he's a psychotic violent woman-beater she doesn't want to hurt him. You'd be surprised at the amount of women who protect their lowlife violent partners!  I'm not saying she IS not reporting because she secretly still cares for him, but it's a pattern seen in many women who are beaten and abused by the scum of the earth.  Violent partners knock all sense and self-esteem out of partners until they become zombies.

[Scunner]

quote:Originally posted by Strawberry


If a wild animal was stalking Calis I'm sure people would want to know about it. And this man is just that.

That comment is recklessly and entirely wrong. Whatever your opinions might be, and I'm sure most members would agree that it is not acceptable behaviour, this is not anything to do with wild people "stalking Calis", this is a domestic matter. Same as it would be in the UK.

[Strawberry]

Hi Scunner,

OK, the brute may not be prouncing up and down with a metal bar in his hands waiting to pounce on some unsuspecting female, but according to the original poster this is something he is capable of doing.

Do you not think it would be wise and prudent to warn people that this man is violent? Supposing another woman falls victim to this brute?  At least if he is named and shamed it may prevent some poor woman in the future having her skull smashed in with a metal bar!

[Strawberry]

Oh, and one more thing!  I'd hardly call this incident 'a domestic'!!!  This is GBH, possibly ATTEMPTED MURDER!

BIG difference between a slap round the face and a few choice words!

The brute needs banging up!

[Scunner]

He also needs the right to not be judged in public, completely based on what the aggrieved party told you. The details have been requested and declined, as I said ages ago in this topic, it's going nowhere. Lots of outrage, lots of sympathy, no facts. That's the whole thing in a nutshell.

[Scunner]

quote:Originally posted by Strawberry

  The man is clearly dangerous and liable to attack someone else again. SPECULATION

He obviously can't control his aggression HEARSAY

And this man is just that. HEARSAY

Besides that, he needs to PAY for what he's done!  SENTENCE WITHOUT TRIAL

How DARE he commit GBH and get away with it!!! HEARSAY

despite the fact he's a psychotic violent woman-beater HEARSAY

Like I said, find me a fact in that lot.

[Strawberry]

OK then, Scunner, so you're suggesting that the original poster is making it all up?  Perhaps she smashed the metal bar into her own face, hmmm?

And in answer to your questions;

IF the OP is telling the truth (and no-one on here seems to disbelieve her) then the man clearly IS dangerous, and dangerous people who attack women with metal bars are liable to repeat dangerous attacks. FACT.

And IF what the OP says is true, then of course the man cannot control his aggression!  If he could he wouldn't have smashed a metal bar into her face nearly taking out her eye socket and breaking her bones!!

He most certainly DOES need to pay for what he's done to her i.e. go to prison for a VERY LONG TIME - and pay her compensation to boot!  Of course he would have a trial (as any other beast would) and that is why I recommended she report this scumbag to the police!

Finally, none of this is HEARSAY!  Hearsay is second-hand information.  The OP's account is not HEARSAY - it is a first-hand account- coming straight from the horse's mouth. BIG DIFFERENCE.

You sound almost sympathetic to the man who did this evil cowardly act!

[Scunner]

I am very sympathetic to anyone who is subjected to abuse, bullying or violence. Due to the fact you know nothing about me it is easy for you to accuse me of being sympathetic to "the guy who did this evil cowardly act". If you took time to read some of my previous posts you would understand how ignorant you are when it comes to handing out opinions on me.

YOU did not see anything, the OP (original poster in case anyone is wondering) has managed 5 pages of sympathy and baying for blood and all over someone you do not know, haven't thought to ask yourself if there are two sides of this story, and have condemned this man wholly and entirely based on something you read. That is HEARSAY. There is no lesser level of hearsay that is not hearsay based on (and I quote) "IF the OP is telling the truth" - that is hearsay.

You have this man guilty as charged, you have quoted the sentence he should receive and you don't know the accuser and you don't know the accused!

I hope you never get picked for jury service, that's me and this nameless man accused in one reply and you haven't got a bloody clue about either of us.

Minxer has been asked to name the guy, she won't, and that is her choice. I have asked her to name him, she won't. Where you think your rants fit in is totally beyond me. Let's hope nobody ever accuses you of anything on CBF, because I guarantee you'll be complaining to me about people like you.