I do think the officials considering approving this enterprise should be shown the above information.
So Please feel free to edit, copy and paste to as many as you can.
I have already thought of the insurance angle,have been trying to identify the insurers of the pool also.Although a difficult task!
Perhaps insurers should know that this pool, on size alone does not conform to European standards.
The reason that the pool size is crucial for our argument, together with the following section on noise, is that this will undoubtably lead to the animals being stressed. Getting into a very small pool with stressed wild animals of size,poses serious safety risks!
Any one out there with suggestions regarding insurers or who have contacts please let us know.
One other point you may like to make,which has so far been ignored by the proposers, is that the E.E.A.M. standards clearly state..
quote ..NOISE..Cetaceans shall be protected from harrassment by excessive noise from irregular impulses. The noise level shall be kept as low as possible for the frequency range between 0 and 60 khz. Sounds of mechanical origin are probably the most stressful for the animals because of their repetitive nature. Any doubts as to the effects of any sound should be referred to an expert with experience of underwater ecoustic measurments, not airbourne acoustics, in conjuction with a vetinary surgeon with experience and or training in this field.. unquote
This pretty well rules out Hisaronu then, as the place to keep dolphins!
Please feel free to qoute this section of the E.E.A.M. standards in any letter you write.