I am very pleased that the Scottish Justice Secretary has properly applied Scottish law in releasing the prisoner on compassionate grounds. He could have courted short-term popularity with voters or kowtowed to the huge threatening power of the US Presidencial apparatus. But he didn't. What Libya makes of it is irrelevent as far as I am concerned; Scottish justice is not responsible for the behaviour of foreign governments and citizens. Nor do I take seriously remarks about mass murderers not showing compassion. Of course they dont; that's what makes them mass murderers. I have no intention of ever basing my own moral judgments and actions upon their example. If a coutry's legal system specifies conditions and criteria for release of prisoners on compassionate grounds then it is these that should determine the decision, not other issues. I heard an American lawyer on the radio saying that people in the US wouldn't understand this as the US legal system has no concept of compassion. Quite, and they can keep it.
For the first time in my life I rather wish I was Scottish - so I could swell with pride that my little country has a legal system robust enough to see the right thing done, according to Scottish law, despite the bullying attempts of a world superpower and crass press barons.