Author Topic: Royal baby Boy  (Read 7374 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Highlander

  • Lord of the Rings
  • Prolific Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 21684
  • Age: 73
  • Location: Dingwall, Ross-shire (God's Own Country)
Re: Royal baby Boy
« Reply #10 on: July 22, 2013, 22:06:11 PM »
Cammy



Offline echogirl1

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 1177
  • Location: cottenham cambs.
  • Newly Registered
Re: Royal baby Boy
« Reply #11 on: July 22, 2013, 22:06:40 PM »
I fancy Louis Charles William  If I am any where near right you lot all owe me a large vodka aqnd tonic!!

Offline KKOB

  • Prolific Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13575
  • I'm hearing the word.... Nonce !
Re: Royal baby Boy
« Reply #12 on: July 22, 2013, 22:09:35 PM »
Yeah, right.

Offline echogirl1

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 1177
  • Location: cottenham cambs.
  • Newly Registered
Re: Royal baby Boy
« Reply #13 on: July 22, 2013, 22:12:15 PM »
Thanks for that I shall wait with bated breath!!

Offline Jacqui Harvey

  • Prolific Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 11170
  • Location: United Kingdom
  • Antiques are Green
Re: Royal baby Boy
« Reply #14 on: July 22, 2013, 22:39:35 PM »
It will not be John.  The Royal Family stopped using this name after one John died and the other one, a son of Queen Mary and George V was born with mental health problems.  He was taken from home and keep in a cottage with a Nanny for years and he died young.  So the Royal Family consider John to be an unlucky name. Note that none of the male Royals have John in their names.
George seems favourite. 
Although a lot of Kings don't use their birth name when they become King.  Charles has said he will not be King Charles, as he considers the fact that one Charles was beheaded not a good omen.  He wants to be Edward.   The Queen's  Father was Albert, but became George as did Victoria's son Bertie (Albert) who became Edward.   

Offline scorcher

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 2025
  • Location: United Kingdom
Re: Royal baby Boy
« Reply #15 on: July 22, 2013, 22:41:25 PM »
Gordon - easy peasy !

Offline usedbustickets

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 2859
  • Age: 69
  • Institute for the hard of understanding
Re: Royal baby Boy
« Reply #16 on: July 22, 2013, 23:21:31 PM »
Bad enough that we are bombarded about this birth by the other sections of the media, in particular the lickspittle BBC, but now its started in my my island of sanity CBF..... Oh woh and thrice woh!!

I would like to see the press pick up and report on this event in their more usual reporting style..

IMMIGRANT FAMILY ADDS ANOTHER MOUTH TO FEED

German Greek immigrant family Saxe Coburg have added another child to its long list of family recipients of state handouts.  This follows their recent narrow escape from the government capping of benefits to £25k, and their fear that they would need to move out from their multi bedroomed palaces homes in and around Westminster in west London.

A former west London neighbour Mr Abu Aqata said from his Jordan prison cell, "This just shows how the country is going to the dogs.  My family have to suffer in a six bedroom home on the new capped benefits, whilst this lot get away with at least three west London homes and at least three homes outside of London on almost unlimited social security payments, and a nasty habit of dodging taxes where they can, it's a disgrace, and somebody from the DSS should be asked to explain the double standards applied to state handouts."

We did approach the pensioner head of the family, Phil The Greek, for comment, but he declined any comment other than to tell our gallant reporter to "sod orf".  Phil's eldest offspring said they were entitled to the payments, particularly since his mother had started to pay some tax on her multi million benefit payments.

« Last Edit: July 22, 2013, 23:47:43 PM by usedbustickets »

Offline Highlander

  • Lord of the Rings
  • Prolific Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 21684
  • Age: 73
  • Location: Dingwall, Ross-shire (God's Own Country)
Re: Royal baby Boy
« Reply #17 on: July 22, 2013, 23:28:25 PM »
Don't agree UBT but it was very amusing and I did enjoy reading it  :).

Offline GordonA

  • Chauvanist Clown & Resident Curmudgeon
  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 2680
  • Age: 21
  • Location: United Kingdom
Re: Royal baby Boy
« Reply #18 on: July 23, 2013, 00:15:29 AM »
Also very succinct and to the point. Well said Mr. Tickets. By the way, I hope the little fella is given the most popular name in the U.K. which is, believe it or not..................................................Mohammed !!

Offline Menthol

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 2267
  • Location: Fethiye
Re: Royal baby Boy
« Reply #19 on: July 23, 2013, 01:17:06 AM »
usedbustickets - you are my kind of guy!  :-*

I'm not a royalist in any shape or form.

And perhaps 'they' should call him Mohammed - Prince Mo.

Inshallah.




Share me

Digg  Facebook  SlashDot  Delicious  Technorati  Twitter  Google  Yahoo
Smf